D.A and Police Department ask the SBI to investigate Cumberland County DSS

letter from Cumberland County District Attorney, Ed Grannis to Cumberland County Manager, James Martin, the District Attorney’s Office and the Fayetteville Police Department are both questioning whether the Cumberland County Department of Social Services has disclosed a “complete and accurate record” regarding the case of murdered 5-year-old, Shaniya Davis.

In the letter dated December 4, 2009, District Attorney, Ed Grannis writes,
 
“This afternoon I met with Chief Bergamine and the members of the investigative team investigating the death of Shaniya Davis.
Following the presentation by the investigators with the Fayetteville Police Department, Chief Bergamine has requested the SBI’s assistance to determine if Fayetteville Police have received complete and accurate records from Cumberland County DSS regarding this case. Based upon the information provided to me and my senior staff by the Fayetteville Police Department concerning these issues, I share their concern and I have requested the assistance of the SBI to assist us in this regard.”
 
Although North Carolina General Statute §7B-2902  permits disclosure to the public in Child fatality or near fatality cases when DSS has been involved, Cumberland County DSS has refused to release any information to the public about their connection or involvement with Shaniya Davis and her family to the public, citing the ongoing investigation.
In a press release issued November 20th Cumberland County DSS stated the following:
 
 Department of Social Services’ Statement On Davis Information Requests
 
FAYETTEVILLE, NC – The Cumberland County Department of Social Services has received numerous requests to release information regarding any connection the department has to Shaniya Davis and her family.
 
In response, the department is releasing the following statement explaining why those requests for information will be denied:
 
The Cumberland County Department of Social Services, through our County Attorney’s Office, consulted with the District Attorney’s Office of the 12th Prosecutorial District, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute §7B-2902(d).
 
The District Attorney has concluded pursuant to North Carolina General Statute §7B-2902(d)(3) and (5) that the release of any information at this time is likely to jeopardize the State’s ability to prosecute the defendant and also is likely to undermine an ongoing or future criminal investigation.
 
As a result, we will deny any request related to the release of information in the child fatality of Shaniya Davis.
 
“We extend our heartfelt sympathy to the family and the community,” said Director Brenda Jackson. “Our focus continues to be on assisting law enforcement in any way possible.”
 
Apparently, the District Attorney’s office and the Fayetteville Police Department are both now questioning whether the focus of CCDSS is indeed assisting law enforcement in any possible way and whether DSS has released all the information they have to local law enforcement and the District Attorney.
 
According to WRAL.com, DSS director Brenda Jackson has said, in a statement released by Cumberland County spokeswoman Sally Shutt, “that she would ensure that her office cooperates with authorities to resolve the matter.”
 
The state Child Fatality Task Force is already reviewing any contact CCDSS had with Shaniya Davis’ family.
A Failure, by Cumberland County DSS, to provide accurate and complete information to the authorities in this case, could affect not only the criminal case, but the findings of the Task Force as well.
This is a perfect example of why there needs to be accountability and transparency in DSS.  Open these departments up to public scrutiny so they cannot hide evidence, their mistakes, or the full extent of their involvement with families.
Allowing DSS to keep their records confidential, prevents full disclosure in many harmful ways and enables them to keep their failures, mistakes and in some cases their law breaking from being discovered.
 
Shaniya was reported missing from her home located at 1116-A Sleepy Hollow Drive, Tuesday, November 10 at around 6:53 a.m.
Shaniya’s body was found November 16, around 1 p.m. in a wooded area Near Highway 87 in Lee County, 6 miles from Sanford and not far from the Comfort Inn hotel where she was last seen alive by a witness.

Surveillance video from the hotel shows Shaniya being carried by Mario Andrette McNeill through the hotel, and into a room, on the morning of her disappearance. The video is time stamped 6:11 a.m.

Police believe that Shaniya was still alive at about 7:30a.m., when she left the hotel.
Mario Andrette McNeill has been charged with Kidnapping, First Degree Murder, and First Degree Rape of Shaniya Davis.
It is unknown if Shaniya’s mother, Antoinette Davis will also face additional charges in her daughter’s death.  Davis has been charged with, Human Trafficking, Felony Child Abuse – Prostitution, Filing a False Police. Report, and Resist, Delay, or Obstruct.
The investigation into the events surrounding Shaniya Davis’ death is still ongoing.

Lawer Accused of Assault on DHS WORKER

A lawyer was hauled out of a Family Court building in handcuffs earlier this week after a social worker accused him of elbowing her in the ribs after he sat down next to her.

Peter Quinn, 53, was charged with aggravated assault and related offenses in the incident, which occurred Tuesday while the two were waiting for a case to be heard in Courtroom K at 1801 Vine St.

After being led out of the building, he was held in a police holding cell for about 15 hours before being released, he said.

Department of Human Services social worker Tamika Cintron, 36, contended that Quinn elbowed her and called her offensive names, according to a police report and DHS Commissioner Anne Marie Ambrose. Ambrose said that Cintron did not know why Quinn elbowed her.

Quinn, in a phone interview yesterday, denied the allegations.

Cintron did not return a phone call for comment.

On Tuesday morning, the two were in the waiting room on a dependency case in which Quinn was representing a parent. Cintron was there to testify in her role as DHS social worker. Cintron was sitting down.

According to a police report, Quinn sat down and threw Cintron’s jacket to the side, then elbowed her in the left side of the ribs. Cintron then stood up and said to Quinn: “What the hell is wrong with you?”

Cintron said Quinn then got up and called her a “bitch.” She then went to Courtroom K to get away from Quinn and Quinn tried to follow her into the room but was stopped at the door by court officers, according to the report.

One observer who was in the court area said yesterday that he saw Cintron by the door yelling, “He hit me! He hit me!” referring to Quinn. The observer said Cintron was “visibly shaken and crying.”

Ambrose yesterday called Cintron an “excellent social worker.”

City records show that Cintron began working at DHS about two years ago. Ambrose said that Cintron characterized the incident as an “unprovoked attack.”

Quinn said that during his approximately 18 years of handling dependency cases “nobody ever accused me of this stuff.”

He said that when he went to sit down in the empty seat, he did not initially know Cintron was next to him. He said that the sleeve of her jacket was on his seat and that he moved it toward her seat.

That “pissed her off,” he said, contending that she then said to him: “What the f— are you doing?”

He contended that she elbowed him, then got up and started yelling in the hallway, which separates the waiting area from Courtroom K.

An aggravated-assault charge is routinely lodged when an alleged victim is a member of a protected class, including that of a social worker. Quinn was also charged with simple assault and reckless endangerment.

Sources who know Quinn professionally yesterday described him as argumentative.

One source who works in Family Court said that Quinn “has had difficulties in dealing with people on a daily basis.” Another source called Quinn “crazy” and said that “lots of people” have had confrontations with him.

When asked about these comments, Quinn said: “I don’t think that’s true.”

Ambrose said she was not aware of any other recent case of a social worker reportedly being attacked while in court. DHS records show there have been 17 reports of social workers’ being injured while out in the field since social worker Danelle Cooper was beaten by Sharonda Sowell in North Philly in fall 2007.

North Carolina Child Protective Services illegal and unethical practices?

Do you know a child who has died during or after a DSS investigation in North Carolina?

Do you know a child who has died after reports of abuse where made to DSS?  Did DSS ignore your report and fail to protect the child?

Do you know a child who has died in foster care or after being adopted from foster care due to child abuse or neglect?

Are you the family member of a child that died during or after DSS involvement?

Are you a family member of a child who has died as a result of DSS policy violations or inaction when it came to investigating reports of abuse?

Do you have documented proof of unethical and illegal activities being committed by DSS in the state of North Carolina?  

Has DSS removed your child/ren or a child you know unlawfully?

Are you a grandparent or relative who has been denied kinship custody?

Do you have proof of perjury, tape recordings, copies of forged or falsified documents, lies?

Do you think the laws should be changed to hold DSS accountable when they break the law or violate their own policies? 

Do you believe the law needs to change to make DSS transparent, and remove their ability to hide behind confidentiality laws?

Do you believe that any complaints against DSS should be handled by an outside agency with no relationship to DSS?

Do you believe if DSS breaks the law and/or policy they should be criminally charged?

Do you have an idea or plan of an effective way to change DSS?

Are you a former DSS worker who is willing to speak about the corruption in this state or the county you worked for?

I want to hear from you.  Please email me at nixonlisa70@yahoo.com

I am trying to compile a list of proven complaints against DSS in North Carolina and I need your help to do so.

Information on all 100 counties in the state of North Carolina is needed.

The purpose of this research is not just to do a story about the corruption, but to inform the public and the legislature so that needed changes to the laws can be made.

If you have any information or answers to the questions above, I am asking you to contact me and share that information. I do require documented proof of actual violations committed by DSS. 

If you were actually abusing your child or children, you need not respond.  I cannot, nor will I help you. 

I am only looking for those that have been wronged by DSS, whose rights were violated, or children whose lives were cut short because DSS failed to protect them.   

Most importantly, I am seeking information on any child that has died in this state with DSS involvement.  It is very hard to find any information about these children, so if you know of any please contact me as soon as possible and include links to any articles, blogs, websites or any other source of information about these children.

I am also looking for volunteers to help me inform the legislature through phone calls, emails and any other contact we can think of.

The only way to affect changes to Child Protective Services in North Carolina is to join together and speak out in a loud, clear voice and demand that change.

The only way that the lawmakers and the public are going to listen is to show them documented proof.

I cannot do this alone, so the question is…whose with me?

Social Workers coming to YOUR house soon!

Washington is about to allow or maybe require “home interventions” by government social(ist) workers to “improve immunization coverage” of youngsters.

This mandate is part of a new law called The Affordable Health Choices Act, which would subsidize states to break into homes against parental wishes and “to implement interventions that are recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force, such as reminders or recalls for patients or providers, or home visits.”

You can bet that when they enter the home, the government spies will find plenty of reasons to report the family to the state child protective services or some other agency. This is a way to allow the “snitch network” to increase its coverage many-fold, by getting right into the home itself without a search warrant. It will inevitably result in a large new harvest of children for the state child protective services apparatus.

tracker


eXTReMe Tracker

<!–
var EXlogin='nisey10' // Login
var EXvsrv='s11' // VServer
EXs=screen;EXw=EXs.width;navigator.appName!="Netscape"?
EXb=EXs.colorDepth:EXb=EXs.pixelDepth;EXsrc="src";
navigator.javaEnabled()==1?EXjv="y":EXjv="n";
EXd=document;EXw?"":EXw="na";EXb?"":EXb="na";
EXd.write("“);//–>


eXTReMe Tracker

<!–
var EXlogin='nisey10' // Login
var EXvsrv='s11' // VServer
EXs=screen;EXw=EXs.width;navigator.appName!="Netscape"?
EXb=EXs.colorDepth:EXb=EXs.pixelDepth;EXsrc="src";
navigator.javaEnabled()==1?EXjv="y":EXjv="n";
EXd=document;EXw?"":EXw="na";EXb?"":EXb="na";
EXd.write("“);//–>

TOTALITARIANISM IN AMERICA

 

By Stephen Baskerville, Ph.D
December 18, 2007
NewsWithViews. com

Mass incarcerations without trial or charge; forced confessions; children forcibly separated from their parents with no reasons given; doctored hearing transcripts and falsified court records; evidence fabricated against the innocent; government agents entering the homes, examining private papers and personal effects, and seizing the property of citizens who are under no suspicion of legal wrongdoing; special courts created specifically to convict people who cannot be convicted in ordinary courts; children instructed to hate their parents by state functionaries: Is all this the Soviet Union in the 1930s or Communist China in the 1960s? Is this some novelist’s prognosticated dystopia? No, all this and more is routine in the United States today.

Among the most disturbing tales to come out of totalitarianism were the revelations of how both Nazi and Communist governments intruded into family life. The practice of governments dictating to parents what they could tell their children or using children as informers against their parents strikes us as chilling and unnatural. Yet similar practices are occurring in America today on a much more massive scale.

What we are talking about here is family law, a secretive political underworld of which few are aware until it strikes them. Parents summoned to family court discover that their children can be taken away, they can be forced to turn over all their property without explanation to government officials and their private clients, their future earnings can be confiscated to the point where they are unable to house or feed themselves, and they can be incarcerated without trial – all without any evidence or even charge that they have committed any actionable offense.

Unlike any other court, family courts do not even pretend that they are concerned with justice. They claim to determine “the best interest of the child” in divorces or other cases where one party is trying to take away someone else’s children. It is not necessary for the parent or parents whose children are targeted to have done anything legally wrong. Because most parents will spend any amount of money not to have their children taken away, these courts are very lucrative for lawyers and others who have developed a stake in taking control of other people’s children.

 

Traditionally, parents determined what was best for their own children. Now courts make that determination, over the objection of parents who have done nothing to forfeit the right to make it themselves. Once courts stop administering justice, they start administering injustice; there is no middle ground. Without justice, asked St. Augustine, “What are kingdoms but great robberies?”

Never before in human history has any government created a machinery whose primary purpose is to take children away from their parents. The Nazis and the Communists both did it. But it was not their principal aim. In America, we have created multibillion dollar machinery that exists for no other purpose.

The very idea of incarcerations without trial should be raising an outcry and have us demanding to know what is taking place in the world’s greatest democracy. Yet we hear nothing but silence from journalists, self-styled civil libertarians, and “human rights” groups.

Conservatives have allowed this to happen by credulously swallowing feminist propaganda about “deadbeat dads,” “pedophile” fathers, and wife-beaters. Having given the Left a monopoly as gatekeepers of the Bill of Rights and civil liberties, conservatives can hardly be surprised that they stand defenseless as the Left targets the family, fathers, Christianity, and other “patriarchal” institutions.

The erosion of our freedoms today is so gradual that few can find tangible points at which to oppose it. But here we have an attack on freedom that is much more direct than culture; it involves a direct assault on private family life by a dangerous government machinery. Until we wake up to the fact that radical feminism is a totalitarian ideology and that the family courts are executing the feminist Terror, we will never reverse the family’s decline.

 

Facile parallels with totalitarian dictatorships drawn by westerners who never experienced those terrors are a much-abused form of criticism and one to which conservatives are especially susceptible. Yet in this case, survivors of those dictatorships readily attest to the similarity. Bogumila and Jerzy Koss compare New York’s family courts to the bureaucratic tyrannies they knew in Poland. “As children we lived through Nazi horror, then through Communist occupation,” they write, “and now, in the United States, the ‘Land of the Free,’ we are persecuted by judicial tyranny.” But in contrast to Nazi and Stalinist regimes, which used children as one weapon among many, today in the Western democracies children and families have become the central object of government tyranny, and parents rather than dissidents have become the targets.

 

After experiencing American family law, Romanian dissident Mihai Muset gained a new perspective on totalitarian justice under communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, by whose regime he had been arrested for a protest. “I was sentenced to two months in prison,” he recalls, “but at least I got to appear in court and talk to the judge. That’s more than I got in family court.”

© 2007 Stephen Baskerville – All Rights Reserved