You are browsing the archive for DCF |

Kinship care vs Fostering

October 15, 2011 in California, DCF, DCFS, DHS, family rights, foster parents, grandparents rights, Idaho, Michigan

I’ve had several people in the past few weeks tell me that they wish to care for their own family members – as opposed to having them placed in foster care, with strangers. These grandparents, aunts, uncles and other close relatives are being told they must become certified foster parents.

Advocating for Children in Foster and Kinship Care: A Guide to Getting the Best out of the System for Caregivers and Practitioners Federal law requires that state social workers attempt to find suitable placement for “at risk” children, who are removed from their home. In many cases the state is merely paying lip-service and doesn’t actually follow the law.

This is a violation of federal law and the state can lose their federal funding. You should always report such violations of federal law to your U.S. House Representation. Call and request an investigation. You will need to provide them with a legal release form, along with the facts and any supporting documents.

Just today the Idaho Press-Tribune ran an interesting article:

In Idaho, more grandparents still in parental role

Many grandparents who take in grandchildren qualify for a $300 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families grant. The amount is the same regardless of the number of children in a family.

Grandparents also can become certified as foster parents, and take in their own grandchildren through the state system. That means more financial support. Monthly foster payments per child in Idaho range from $274 to $431 based on age; payments increase if children have special needs. Foster children get Medicaid cards and other benefits.

But many families don’t want to do that, Perry said. Some bristle at the idea of giving the state that much control over their families, even temporarily.

“They feel taking care of their own family is their responsibility,” he said.

Tracee Crawford, one of the leaders of the Grandparents as Parents of the Treasure Valley, a Southwest Idaho support group, said grandparents sometimes hesitate to ask for help of any kind, afraid that if they make trouble, their children will take the grandchildren away.

Becoming a legal guardian, another option, comes with its own complications, including steep legal costs, said Crawford.

She became part of a kin-care family when her daughter had cancer. Crawford cared for her and her grandson until her daughter died. She’s been in long legal battles with her former son-in-law over visitation rights with her grandson.

“To become a legal guardian, you have to prove a parent — your child — is unfit,” she said. “That’s really hard to do” — factually and emotionally.

Each state is different, which makes it difficult to know exactly what the law is your own state.

In my own case, I was shocked to find that while I was getting monthly kinship care checks from the State of California of ($357 – back in 2002), at the same time, another relative had a sibling to my grandson. The only difference was that they lived in Michigan; her checks from the State of Michigan – $123.  I felt bad for her because this child has autism and even in Michigan $123. doesn’t go far.

Be sure you check into your own states law, make a few phone calls, talk to an attorney and check out a few state websites before you sign anything. The choice you make could make a big difference in just how much help you are entitled to.

On that note, let me just remind you that if you accept money from the state, you accept all the strings that go along with that money, but it’s better than starving — maybe. We didn’t like giving up so much of our privacy, so we stopped received state funds many years ago – as soon as we could stand on our own two feet.

Knowledge is Power! Exercise your brain.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Anonymous Callers

November 25, 2008 in DCF

I recently lost my mother and, as I’m sure this is a familiar scenario; instead of drawing our remaining family closer, my brother and I are now mortal enemies.

Anonymous Callers

He has called DCF anonymously on me 4 different times, each back-to-back, meaning I have been under a microscope for over a year. What I’d like to know is, how can a system designed to protect children, gage in any way whether this system is a success, failure or somewhere in the middle if a large portion of its’ calls are anonymous? If an individual can continuously call anonymously, how is it determined if this is not a case of harassment?

I understand the reason for anonymous reporting. However, I feel that although that individual’s identity won’t be released to the person(s) accused, they need to be held accountable in some way for making the accusation.

I suggest that anyone who calls in a report should be willing to have a check into his or her background as well. If they have nothing to hide, and aren’t simply using this as a means of revenge, then not only would it stop people with this intent, but, by getting both sides of the “story,” would it not give a more complete and clearer picture of the truth?

Moreover, as much as we’d like to think we live in a nonjudgmental world — well, need I say more?

In each of the 4 instances, the police showed up at my kids’ school, without my even being notified. I am no longer comfortable attending school functions, but, even more tragic; every time the doorbell rings, my kids panic.

My neighbors have all been interrogated by the DCF caseworkers so once again I automatically look guilty!

This system needs to be reevaluated, and monumental changes need to be made to truly protect our children!

It is unjust and absolutely despicable to think that this country, founded on the rights of the individual, not only leaves the accused with no rights, oftentimes, these rights aren’t merely overlooked, they are denied and abused.

You cannot determine a system’s success when there simply is no way to measure its’ status. And, moreover, how are the future outcomes of these kids being tracked, reported, and by what means are these outcomes evaluated?

These incidents have terrified my kids, and caused horrific problems where there previously were none. I ask you the public, but, also, I am directly inquiring as to how DCF plans to repair all the damage and devastation they have caused?


Skip to toolbar